top of page
Publications & News


When Sick Leave Becomes A Legal Risk For Employers
The relationship between medical evidence and employment decisions is becoming an increasingly delicate one. A recent High Court decision illustrates how easily employers can misstep when illness, workplace expectations and legal obligations collide. In Sunshine Bread Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Auric Flavours Sdn Bhd) v Tan Seng Kok [2025] MLJU 4354, the High Court affirmed that an employee dismissed while recovering from severe illness had been terminated without just caus


A Recalibration Of Damages In Malaysian Medical Negligence Claims
The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Bukit Tinggi Hospital Sdn Bhd & Anor v Navin Sharma A/L Karam Chand & Anor [2025] MLJU 3236 marks a notable shift in the Malaysian judiciary’s approach to the assessment of damages in medical negligence cases. At a time when both the volume of claims and the amount of awards are rising, the judgment signals a more restrained, evidence-driven methodology particularly in relation to dependency claims, awards for pain and suffering and lo


Aesthetic Medicine In Malaysia: Navigating The Legal & Regulatory Framework
Aesthetic medicine is a field that is experiencing steady growth internationally, largely driven by the increasing societal emphasis on personal appearance, which has heightened demand for aesthetic products, devices and procedures. This rising demand is reshaping the healthcare landscape with a growing number of medical practitioners incorporating aesthetic medicine into their practice. However, concerning reports of adverse outcomes, ranging from severe deformities to life-


Duty, Diagnosis & Documentation: The Clinical And Legal Importance Of Medical History Taking
History taking remains one of the most critical components of clinical assessment, guiding the formulation of differential diagnoses, informing appropriate investigations and determining safe as well as effective treatment plans. A thorough medical history can, in some cases, account for up to 70% of diagnoses, even before any physical examination or diagnostic testing. In addition to eliciting symptoms, good history taking uncovers relevant comorbidities, risk factors, all


Regulating Remote Care: A Legal Overview Of Telemedicine
The integration of technology into healthcare has improved drastically in recent years. As consultations, diagnoses, medical records and even prescriptions move online, the legal framework government telemedicine, or lack of it, is being tested in real time. The traditional in-person or face-to- face consultation with a practitioner is no longer the sole method of accessing general practice services in Malaysia. Once considered a supplementary tool for rural outreach, telem


Complaint Handling: Understanding Grievance Mechanism Procedures
An aggrieved patient may pursue a medical negligence claim when their complaint relates to the standard of clinical care they received and it is alleged that this care fell below an acceptable standard. However, not all patient grievances amount to a medical negligence claim. In some cases, dissatisfaction may stem from the conduct or attitude of a medical practitioner, healthcare worker or other staff members at a private healthcare facility. A patient may also be aggrieved


Expert Witness In Medical Negligence Claims
In medical negligence claims, the plaintiff is generally required to prove that the doctor failed to meet the expected standard of care, which caused the plaintiff harm. Given that this issue falls predominantly within the domain of medical science, the court ordinarily would rely heavily on the evidence of medical experts appointed by the parties. Section 45 of the Evidence Act 1950 (EA 1950) states: “(1) When the court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreig


Dento-Legal Issues: Understanding Liability In Dental Negligence
Dental negligence claims are not uncommon in Malaysia, with legal actions being initiated against dentists over the years. Patients have several avenues to pursue claims of alleged negligence, including filing a civil lawsuit or lodging a complaint with the Malaysian Dental Council. Additionally, dental practitioners and/or dental clinics may face criminal prosecution for negligent misconduct1. Legal proceedings can have serious consequences for dentists, including reputation


Social Media & Digital Marketing: Medicolegal Advice When Promoting Your Practice
In today’s digital age, social media and digital marketing have become vital tools for healthcare professionals to grow their practices. Platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram and practitioner websites provide valuable opportunities for healthcare professionals to educate the public and actively engage with the community. However, the growing prevalence of social media also amplifies the risks to patient confidentiality. Practitioners must exercise caution


Limitation Periods In Medical Negligence Claims
As with all civil claims, medical negligence claims are subject to the defence of limitation. If a claim is filed in court after the limitation period has expired, the defendant may invoke this as a defence, which operates as an absolute defence; if successfully established, the claim will be struck out regardless of its merits. The legal framework governing the limitation period for medical negligence claims in Malaysia is intricate. Several statutory provisions prescribe


Confidentiality In a Doctor-Patient Relationship
Confidentiality is a fundamental principle at the heart of the doctor-patient relationship. It ensures that personal health information shared during medical consultations is kept private and secure, fostering trust and open communication between patients and their medical practitioners. In the medical field, confidentiality is not only a professional and ethical obligation but also a legal one, with serious implications for both patients and practitioners if breached. Patien


Medicolegal Essentials: What Every GP Needs To Know
Historically, general practitioners (GPs) have been regarded as having particularly trusted and close relationships with their patients, which likely contributed to the relatively low number of medical negligence claims against them. However, the traditional model of the “ family doctor ” has become less prevalent, with patients now often registered with a practice rather than a specific GP. Further, patients are also increasingly seeking care through walk-in clinics or the r


Informed Consent To Medical Treatment : Legal and Ethical Considerations
Informed consent to medical treatment is fundamental in both medical ethics and law. It requires that patients fully understand the nature of their medical treatment, including risks, benefits, and alternatives, before agreeing to proceed. Once fully informed, patients can voluntarily decide whether to proceed with the treatment. This process is crucial for safeguarding patients' autonomy and ensuring that they play an active role in making decisions about their healthcare.


Ownership And Access: Understanding Medical Records In Malaysia
Generally, comprehensive and clear medical records are the distinguishing feature of a good medical practice. A patient’s medical records should be clear, accurate, legible, made contemporaneously, signed and dated, facilitating easy refresh of patient information for continuity of care and follow-up, as well as for future reference such as preparing medical reports. Who do medical records belong to? According to The Guideline of The Malaysian Medical Council [MMC Guideli


The Liability Of Private Hospitals In Medical Negligence Cases
In medical negligence cases, once negligence by the doctor has been established, the dispute then focuses on who should pay the damages, either the hospital or the doctor or both. The prevalent industry practice now sees the doctor being contracted by the hospital as an independent contractor instead of an employee. This arrangement is effective to minimise the risk that the hospital will be held liable for negligent acts by the doctor. As the doctor is no longer an employe


Causation In Negligence Claims: The ‘But For’ Test vs The Proximate Cause Test
Recently, the Court of Appeal in SAJ Ranhill Sdn Bhd v SWM Greentech Sdn Bhd & Anor [2023] 1 LN 881 revisited the principles in relation to causation in an action for negligence. Background Facts The Appellant (SAJ Ranhill Sdn Bhd) was the operator of a water treatment plant (WTP) which sourced raw water from Sungai Benut which was then treated at the WTP. On the other hand, the Respondents (SWM Greentech Sdn Bhd and SWM Environment Sdn Bhd) were responsible for the operation
bottom of page
